Legal Opinion

Kessler v. Williston

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1947No. 17,670PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlanagan, J.

This is an action to establish the paternity of a child born out of wedlock.

We are met at the outset by the contention of appellee that this appeal is not properly brought because it is brought under the provisions of the “children born out of wedlock” statute (Acts 1941, ch. 112, § 3-640, Burns’ 1933), whereas it should be brought under the general statutes relating to juvenile courts. With this contention we do not agree. Our Supreme Court, in the case of State ex rel. v. Lake Cir cuit Court (1945), 223 Ind. 375, 61 N. E. (2d) 168, considered the various statutes relating to cases triable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Gannon v. Lake Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Watkins v. WatkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Shupe v. BELLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Ford v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
  4. DeArmond v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  5. DeARMOND v. CARTER D/B/A, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API