Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rhodes v. Oxley

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 10, 1931No. 40634Published

1DissentKindig, J.

(dissenting) — It occurs to me that the'original notice under consideration is not more defective than many other notices sustained by this court.

The. following of our -cases are sufficiently illustrative: Lyon v. Byington, 10 Iowa 124, involved an. omission of the name of the State; Fanning v. Krapfl, 68 Iowa 244, involved a discrepancy in the name-of the defendant; a like discrepancy was involved in Mallory v. Riggs, 76 Iowa 748; Allison v. C. B. & Q. R. Co., 76 Iowa 209; Schee v. LaGrange, 78 Iowa 101; Lindsey v. Delano, 78 Iowa 350; Davis v. Burt, 7 Iowa (Clarke), 56; McDonnell v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cummings v. LandesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. Kitsmiller v. KitchenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Fanning v. KrapflSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
  4. Lindsey v. DelanoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Decatur County v. ClementsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API