Rhodes v. Oxley
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentKindig, J.
(dissenting) — It occurs to me that the'original notice under consideration is not more defective than many other notices sustained by this court.
The. following of our -cases are sufficiently illustrative: Lyon v. Byington, 10 Iowa 124, involved an. omission of the name of the State; Fanning v. Krapfl, 68 Iowa 244, involved a discrepancy in the name-of the defendant; a like discrepancy was involved in Mallory v. Riggs, 76 Iowa 748; Allison v. C. B. & Q. R. Co., 76 Iowa 209; Schee v. LaGrange, 78 Iowa 101; Lindsey v. Delano, 78 Iowa 350; Davis v. Burt, 7 Iowa (Clarke), 56; McDonnell v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cummings v. LandesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Kitsmiller v. KitchenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Fanning v. KrapflSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- Lindsey v. DelanoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Decatur County v. ClementsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.