Legal Opinion
Anchor Savings Bank, FSB v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 31, 2015No. 95-39 CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Winstar; Tax Gross Up
OPINION and ORDER
Block, Judge.
This is before the court to determine the amount of tax gross up that plaintiff is entitled to and to finalize the total amount to be awarded to plaintiff in this litigation.
The following is a brief summary of the pertinent facts. For a more detailed account, see Anchor Sav. Bank, FSB v. United States, 121 Fed.Cl. 296 (2015) (“Anchor V”). In 1995, plaintiff, Anchor Savings Bank, FSB (“Anchor”), 1 filed suit in this court, claiming that the United States had breached the terms of several agreements with Anchor. Specifically, plaintiff argued…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Lasalle Talman Bank, F.S.B. v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Home Savings of America, Fsb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Energy Transportation Group, Inc. v. William Demant Holding A/S, WDH Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sonoma Apartment Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Sonoma Apartment Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- 5th and Walnut Parking, LLC; 5th and Walnut Tower, LLC; 5th and Court, LLC; Justin Mandelbaum; and Sean Mandelbaum v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2026
- Sonoma Apartment Associates v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017