Legal Opinion

Ex parte Gust

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 16, 1992No. 01-91-00611-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DUGGAN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of habe-as corpus relief from a governor’s warrant of extradition. We affirm.

The extradition before us is “discretionary” (“The Governor of this State may also surrender ... ”), as described in section 6 of the Uniform Criminal Extradition Act. Tex.Code Crim.Proc.Ann. art. 51.13, § 6 (Vernon 1978). The governor’s warrant directs that appellant, Michael Lee Gust, be remanded to the State of Mississippi to answer an indictment for the offense of conspiracy to commit burglary of an automobile. After two hearings on Gust’s application for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michigan v. DoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Clemons v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Puerto Rico v. BranstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Ex Parte CainCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Ex Parte HarrisonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Elizabeth Provost, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
  2. Ruben O. Garza, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API