Legal Opinion

Silver Valley Mining Co. v. North Carolina Smelting Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1896PublishedCited by 4 opinions

MotioN, by successful appellant, to tax cost of printing record.

1Opinion of the Court

Olakic, J.:

The printed record is 80 pages, and the appellant being successful in obtaining a new trial here moves under Rule 31 to tax the cost of printing the excess above the regulation 20 pages in the costs. The appellant was compelled to print the whole of the “ case on appeal ” and the exhibits made a part thereof. Barnes v. Crawford, at this Term. He is therefere entitled to have taxed the cost of printing the whole case on appeal, (Durham v. Railroad, 108 N. C., 403,) and also of printing other matter besides, if of the nature required by the rule, but not for the printing of matter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. . LewaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cressler v. Asheville.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Sigman v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Hancock v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Harle-Haas Drug Co. v. Rogers Drug Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API