United States v. Vytautas Gecas
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to determine whether a witness may invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for fear of foreign prosecution. The district court held that the Fifth Amendment privilege was not a “personal ‘right’ conferred upon persons within the protection of American law,” United States v. Gecas, 830 F.Supp. 1403, 1421 (N.D.Fla.1993), and thus could not “protect a witness who fears incrimination or prosecution under the criminal laws of a foreign sovereign,” id. at 1423. The district court ordered the witness to testify, and he appealed.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Vytautas GecasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Aloyzas BalsysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BalsysDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- United States v. LileikisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- United States v. Vytautas GecasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.