Legal Opinion

United States v. Vytautas Gecas

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 13, 1995No. 93-3291PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BIRCH, Circuit Judge:

This case requires us to determine whether a witness may invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination for fear of foreign prosecution. The district court held that the Fifth Amendment privilege was not a “personal ‘right’ conferred upon persons within the protection of American law,” United States v. Gecas, 830 F.Supp. 1403, 1421 (N.D.Fla.1993), and thus could not “protect a witness who fears incrimination or prosecution under the criminal laws of a foreign sovereign,” id. at 1423. The district court ordered the witness to testify, and he appealed.…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. Vytautas GecasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Aloyzas BalsysCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. BalsysDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
  4. United States v. LileikisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
  5. United States v. Vytautas GecasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API