Legal Opinion
MARTIN v. SAUL
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 16, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01209Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENAYA MARTIN o/b/o N.D.M., : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : KILOLO KIJAKAZI, : NO. 20-cv-01209-RAL Commissioner of Social Security,1 : RICHARD A. LLORET December 16, 2021 U.S. Magistrate Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION Denaya Martin, on behalf of her minor daughter, N.D.M., seeks review of the denial of her claim for Social Security Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). The ALJ found that N.D.M. suffers from four severe impairments, but found that she did not suffer from the functional equivalent of a listing condition. Upon review…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Evelyn Plummer v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.