Franklin Savings Institution v. Heinsman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Horton v. Bayne,. 52 Mo. 531; Hughes v. McAllister, 15 Mo. 296 ; Benoist. v. Siter, 9 Mo. 657 ; Chitty on Bills, 221, 222; Hall v..
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Horton v. Bayne,. 52 Mo. 531; Hughes v. McAllister, 15 Mo. 296 ; Benoist. v. Siter, 9 Mo. 657 ; Chitty on Bills, 221, 222; Hall v.. Wilson, 16 Barb. 548; Hamilton v. Marks, 52 Mo. 78 Murry v. Gardner, 2 Wall. 121; Welch v. Sage, 47 N. Y. 143; Brush v. Scribner, 11 Conn. 388. cited: Murry v. Gardner, 2' Wall. 110 ; Savey v. Hays, 20 Iowa, 25 ; Coursey v. Curtis, 18 Ga. 237 ; Graff v. Shannon, 7 Iowa, 508 ; Kenhue v. Williams, 1 Duer (N. Y.), 597; Pars, on Con. (4th ed.) 436 5 Pars. on Con. (5th ed.) 520 ; McGrew v. Browder, 14 Mart. L. (La.) 17 ;…
1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.
This was a suit in replevin for the recovery of five negotiable promissory notes of the value of $850. Plaintiff obtained possession of the notes under an order of delivery, and recovered j uclgment in the Circuit Court.
The testimony tended to prove that the notes, indorsed in blank, were in the lawful custody of the plaintiff for collection; that long before their maturity they were stolen from plaintiff’ by one Bodell, who, adding his own indorsement, sold and delivered them to defendant. Defendant offered to prove that she paid value for the notes before their maturity; that she received…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goodman v. SimondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Hall v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1853
- Seybel v. . National Currency BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fogg v. School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1898
- Allen v. HarrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- Savings-Bank v. St. Louis Stoneware Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1877
- Courtial v. LowensteinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899