Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Stuyvesant

Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors

Decided March 15, 1814PublishedCited by 4 opinions

THIS cause came before this court, oh a writ of error, from (he supreme court. For the facts in the case, and the judgment of the court below, see vol. 9. p. 61.

1Opinion of the Court

P. W. Radcliff, Senator.

Concurring in the opinion of the supreme court, and the reasons assigned for it, I shall merely add, that, however proper the facts relied on by the plaintiffs, and the arguments deduced from them, might be in an action of ejectment to recover the possession, or on a writ of right to try She title, it is impossible that they should avail them here. It is expressly stated in the bill of exceptions, not merely as a fact set up and attempted to be proved on the trial, but as actually proved and established, that at the time the alleged trespass was committed, the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corning v. RooseveltNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Fraser v. HunterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1838
  3. Jewett v. DringerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1878
  4. Stevens v. Mayor of New YorkThe Superior Court of New York City · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API