Legal Opinion

Pauly v. Pauly

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 4, 1904PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from the District. Court of Canadian County; before C. F. Irwin, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by

Buhwell, J.:

Hattie E. Pauly commenced an action against Adam W. Pauly in the district court of Canadian county for divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty, and fox alimony. The defendant filed a cross petition charging the plaintiff with adultery. On the trial the court found that the defendant was without fault, and ¿ranted him a divorce on the ground of adultery, and decreed to the plaintiff one thousand dollars as permanent alimony. From this award the defendant appeals, and insists that the court there-? by committed prejudicial error.

A careful examination of the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tobin v. TobinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Mueller v. MuellerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ecker v. EckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Barnett v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Hartshorn v. HartshornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API