United States v. Burks
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
The issue before us in the present appeal has to do with the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the court-martial’s finding that the accused’s desertion was terminated by apprehension. Prosecution Exhibit 2, an extract copy of an entry in Burks’ service record, recites that he was “Apprehended by FBI and released to civil authorities in Mai’ked Tree, Arkansas 22 December 1954 to await naval guards from this activity.”
This entry was made in accordance
with an official duty imposed by Naval directives and is admissible in evidence. United States v. Coates, 2 USCMA 625, 10…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. CoatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- United States v. SimoneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. LugoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955