Legal Opinion

Erhart v. Kaw Valley Drainage District

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1914No. 19,311PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

F. F. Erhart, who is a resident taxpayer of the Kaw Valley Drainage District, sought, by this action, to enjoin the holding of the regular election of the directors of the district, claiming that the board in providing for the election had designated more polling places than the law authorizes. The trial court denied the injunction, and Erhart appeals.

It appears that the district is over seven miles long, extending along the Kaw river through the populous part of Kansas City and outside the corporate limits to a point beyond the village…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gilleland v. SchuylerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Wildman v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
  3. Douglass v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Griebel v. School District No. 6Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API