Legal Opinion

Weinstein v. Weinstein

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 8, 1950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

10 N.J. Super. 68 (1950)

76 A.2d 532

HERMAN WEINSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY AND TRADING AS MERIT REALTY CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MATTHEW WEINSTEIN, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. HERMAN WEINSTEIN, TRADING AS MERIT REALTY CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MATTHEW LOIBL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 9, 1950.

Decided November 8, 1950.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Dominick F. Pachella argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Herbert Fenster, attorney).

Mr. Albert S. Gross argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pirozzi v. Acme Holding Company of PatersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Houston v. SiebertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  3. Kelley v. HicksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  4. Cropanese v. OntellNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beckmann, Inc. v. (Zinke's) Rainbow's EndNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  2. The First New Hampshire Corp. v. Van SyckleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Radio Taxi Service, Inc. v. Lincoln Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API