Legal Opinion

Memphis & Charleston R. R. v. Hopkins

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Probate Court of Colbert. Tried before Hon. Fox Heljaney.

1Opinion of the CourtHaralson, J.

The constitution of this State, Art. XIV, Sec. 21, provides, that “Every railroad company shall have the right with its road, to intersect, connect with, or cross any other railroad &c.” To carry that provision into effect, section 1582 (1842) of the Code was adopted substantially, as far back as the year, 1876. Acts 1875-6, p. 249, § 15. This section was declared unconstitutional by this court, on the ground, that it did not provide for an appeal from the assessment of damages by the arbitrators. — M. & C. R. R. Co. v. B. S. & T. R. R. Co. 96 Ala. 571. This left the section of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montg. So. Railway Co. v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Memphis & Charleston Railroad v. Birmingham, Sheffield & Tennessee River Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Ala. Great Southern RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Woodward Iron Co. v. CabanissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. North Alabama Development Co. v. ShortSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Birmingham Railway & Electric Co. v. Birmingham Traction Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API