Legal Opinion

Coffelt v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 1965No. 5-3532 and 5-3533PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

In each of these two companion cases the trial court entered an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint and granting the plaintiff ten days in which to amend. Roth plaintiffs filed notices of appeal and in due time lodged the records in this court.

The appellees have filed motions to dismiss the appeals, under our settled rule that an order 'which merely sustains a demurrer, without dismissing the complaint, is not a final appealable order. Ark. State Board of Architects v. Larsen, 226 Ark. 536, 291 S. W. 2d 269. The appellants, citing Nunez v. O. K. Processors, 238 Ark. 346, 381 S. W. 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arkansas State Board of Architects v. LarsenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  2. Nunez v. O. K. ProcessorsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pascall v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Searcy v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  3. Brown v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Smith v. PuterbaugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API