Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Schwegel
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided August 17, 1990No. 18225PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTERS, Chief Judge.
This action arises from an oral agreement between the owner of a vintage automobile and the owner of an auto-body shop concerning the restoration and repair of the vehicle. The focal issue on appeal is whether the trial court employed a proper measure of recovery. We conclude that the proper measure was applied and we affirm the judgment entered in the magistrate’s decision in favor of the repair shop.
The relevant facts are as follows. In April of 1980, George Anderson and Ronald Schwegel met to discuss the possibility of restoring Anderson’s 1935 Plymouth automobile.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Continental Forest Products, Inc. v. Chandler Supply Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
- Vickery v. RitchieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Dale's Service Company, Inc. v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Peavey v. PellandiniIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Chadderdon v. KingIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Erickson v. FlynnIdaho Court of Appeals · 2002
- Blaser v. CameronIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991