Legal Opinion

Michael Magnone v. United States of America, Joseph v. Magnone and Rose Magnone v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 25, 1990No. 1151, 1145, Dockets 90-6006, 90-6008PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Magnone and Joseph V. and Rose Magnone appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Michael B. Mukasey, Judge, dismissing their suits for abatement of interest on tax deficiency assessments. We affirm for the reasons given by Judge Mukasey in his thorough opinion reported at 733 F.Supp. 613. We write only to clarify the circuit law.

In 1987 the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) assessed plaintiffs for tax deficiencies in the tax years 1974-1976. In 1988 plaintiffs paid all taxes due for those years as well as the interest accrued in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Flora v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Magnone v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. GreenUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. United States v. John & Patricia FormaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Raymond E. McMillen Jr. And Laura McMillen v. United States Department of TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. In Re ShapiroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. United States v. IsleyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API