Legal Opinion
Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 16, 1963No. 28Published
1Opinion of the Court 1
375 U.S. 217 (1963)
FOTI
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
No. 28.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued October 17, 21, 1963.
Decided December 16, 1963.
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
James J. Cally argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Philip R. Monahan argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox and Assistant Attorney General Miller.
Jack Wasserman and David Carliner filed a brief for the Association of Immigration and Nationality Lawyers, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance.
2Opinion of the Court · WarrenChief Justice Warren
Involved in this case is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Constantinos Roumeliotis and Panayota Roumeliotis, His Wife v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
- Francesco Foti, A/K/A Frank Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.