Legal Opinion

Emonet v. Tomlinson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1964No. 1121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CULPEPPER, Judge.

This is a suit to enjoin the violation of certain building restrictions. The district judge sustained defendant’s motion for summary judgment, dismissing plaintiff’s suit, on the grounds that the suit was filed too late under the provisions of the restrictive covenants themselves. Plaintiffs appealed.

*383As shown by plaintiffs’ petition, and certain affidavits filed by defendant in support of his motion for summary judgment, the facts are as follows: Plaintiffs are owners of Lots number 39 and 66 respectively in the Indian Hills Subdivision to the city of Opelousas. Defendant is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kay v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
  2. McGuffy v. WeilSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  3. Salerno v. De LuccaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  4. Munson v. BerdonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leake v. Campbell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  2. Garden Quarter I Ass'n v. ThorenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  3. Emonet v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  4. Scott R. Leake and Susan E. Leake, Individually and on Behalf of the Architectural Control Committee of the Sunny Meadows Addition v. Therman M. Campbell, Jr. and Susan M. Campbell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
  5. Scott R. Leake and Susan E. Leake, Individually and on Behalf of the Architectural Control Committee of the Sunny Meadows Addition v. Therman M. Campbell, Jr. and Susan M. Campbell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API