Legal Opinion
Cooke v. Insurance Co. of North America
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 17, 1992No. 91-02656PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.
Bobby Cooke, d/b/a Continental Top Shop (Cooke), brought an action against Insurance Company of North America (INA) and INAC Corporation (INAC) due to INAC’s request for cancellation and INA’s actual cancellation of Cooke’s garage and premises insurance policies. INA is the insurer and INAC is the premium finance company. The primary issue in this case is whether INAC’s notice of intent to cancel Cooke’s insurance policies complied with the premium finance cancellation statute, section 627.848, Florida Statutes (1987), and if not, whether such noncompliance precluded…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Palma v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- REED BY & THROUGH LAWRENCE v. BowenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Tate v. Hamilton Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Bankers Ins. Co. v. PannunzioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Universal Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., an Indiana Company v. Mark Jabin and Lelia JabinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Insurance Company of North America v. CookeSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Cooke v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Universal Fire & Casualty Insurance Co., an Indiana Company v. Mark Jabin and Lelia JabinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994