Legal Opinion

Fort v. Demmer

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 12, 1932No. 13,114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

George E. Demmer, defendant in error, will hereinafter be referred to as plaintiff, and Mabel Fort, plaintiff in error, as defendant. Plaintiff began an unlawful detainer action in the justice of the peace court against defendant. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff, from which judgment defendant attempted an appeal to the county court. In the county court both plaintiff and defendant filed written motions for dismissal, and the county court granted plaintiff’s motion, and rendered judgment accordingly. Defendant prosecutes this writ seeking a reversal for reasons which will hereinafter…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Deitz v. City of CentralSupreme Court of Colorado · 1871
  2. Joss v. HallettSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  3. Noble v. City of Canon CitySupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Babnik v. CuligSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Behr v. BurgeColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Mahaney v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Buss v. McKeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  4. Southwestern Greyhound Lines v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API