Clark v. State

The writ of error brings for review judgment of conviction of assault with intent to commit murder in the second degree.

Two questions' are stated by attorney for plaintiff in error in his brief. The first questions the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the identity of the accused'as the person committing the alleged unlawful assault. The identification by one who testified she was' an eye witness was posi tive and unequivocal. The jury evidently believed she spoke the truth and that question was settled.

By the second question is challenged the propriety of certain questions, propounded…