Legal Opinion

Bailey Hunt Jones & Busto, P.A. v. Roland Langen, P.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 7, 1993No. 93-1268PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Because (a) the attorney’s fee, which was previously awarded by the trial court to the two law firms representing the plaintiffs in the underlying class action amounting to 25% of the $9,200,000 settlement obtained, was contingent upon the plaintiffs prevailing in the action and was therefore a “contingency fee,” within the meaning of the fee-sharing agreement between the two law firms, and (b) there was substantial, competent evidence adduced below that Hilary Langen, as required by the above fee-sharing agreement, worked on the underlying class action as an associate with the Bailey Hunt…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waters v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  2. Malver v. Sheffield Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  3. Gamble v. MillsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Association of Unit Owners of Deer Lodge Condominium, Inc. v. Big Sky of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kuhnlein v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API