Legal Opinion

Succession of Dielman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 21, 1924No. 25515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, j.

William H. Dielman died testate, and in his will, after making certain specific bequests, left the residue of his estate to his wife and an adopted daughter. There were no children of the blood but deceased left a mother and sister. The will was duly probated, and Mrs. Mary M. Dielman, mother of deceased, intervened in the succession, claiming to be a forced heir, and asked that the will be annulled in so far as it affected her légitime of one-third of the entire estate.

The wife and adopted daughter took the position that, first, the mother was not a forced heir because of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Succession of MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1888
  2. Succession of GreenlawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  3. Succession of TellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. GrayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Shimshak v. CoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Succession of CarreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  4. Succession of BushSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API