One Buick Automobile v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma; R. R. Williams, Judge. Ribel in the United States to forfeit an automobile as having been used in introducing intoxicants into Indian country, in which T. C. Wilson, as claimant, intervened. Judgment of condemnation, and claimant brings error.
1Per curiam
This is a writ of error to review a judgment of condemnation of one automobile. The United States Attorney filed a libel against it, asking for a forfeiture thereof for violation of that provision of the Indian Appropriation Act of Congress approved March 2, 1917, 39 St. 970 (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, § 4141a), which reads:
“That automobiles or any other vehicles or conveyances used in introducing, or attempting to introduce, intoxicants into the Indian country, or where the introduction is prohibited by treaty or federal statute, whether used by the owner thereof or other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Horning v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Allis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Lesser Cotton Co. v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Robinson & Co. v. BeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Laughter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beery v. BreedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- United States v. 673 Cases of Distilled Spirits & WinesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
- Malouff v. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. Fifty-two CasesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1945