Legal Opinion

United States v. Ismael Cruz

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 20, 2013No. 11-15363Unpublished

1Per curiam

Ismael Cruz appeals his conviction and his 108-month total sentence after a jury found him guilty of robbing a Bank of America branch, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), (d), as charged in Count 1 of his indictment. 1 Cruz raises two main arguments on appeal. First, he contends that the government presented insufficient evidence at trial to prove that he was the individual who committed the Bank of America robbery. Second, he argues that the district court imposed a substantively unreasonable sentence by refusing to credit his claim of innocence regarding the Bank of America robbery and to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. PhaknikoneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carey Antonio PIERCE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API