Legal Opinion

In re Hoover

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1902No. 1,620PublishedCited by 20 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, District Judge.

In this case $85, the rent of Hoover, the tenant, was in arrear, and his landlord lawfully distrained for that sum. Under the statutes and decisions of Pennsylvania he *137thereby acquired a lien to that amount upon all the personal property on the premises, for by lease the tenant had lawfully waived the benefit of the exemption law of the state. Pending a sale of the distrained goods, Hoover filed a petition in bankruptcy, and therein claimed as his statutory exemption an automobile then held by the bailiff under the distress warrant. Thereafter the goods were taken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Longstreth v. PennockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. In re BolingerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1901

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Martin v. OrgainCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1909
  2. Rosenblum v. UberCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1919
  3. In re BennettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  4. In re MitchellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1902
  5. In re Hays, Foster & Ward Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API