Legal Opinion
In Re Estate of Ruggles
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 1973No. 830Published
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
The appellant is a son and eoexecntor named in the will of Wilhelmina Ruggles, testatrix. Netta W. Schnee is a daughter of the testatrix and was naiñed the other coexecutor in the will. Both filed applications to be appointed executor (executrix) of the estate. The sole remaining heirs, also named in the will, were the other two children of the testatrix and they joined with Netta W. Schnee in opposing the appointment of West R. Rug-gles.
On Jnly 12, 1973, the trial judge entered judgment, after an evidentiary hearing upon the motions of Netta W. Schnee and the other two children, finding that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Joyce Marie Clemons, an Infant by Gertrude Clemons, Her Mother and Next Friend v. The Board of Education of Hillsboro, Ohio, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- In Re Proving the Will of LelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Davis v. DavisMahoning County Court of Common Pleas · 1970
- Morgan v. MorganMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Grossman v. GrossmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.