Chicago, K. & S. Ry. Co. v. Kindlesparker
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan; Clarence W. Sessions, Judge. Action by Gale Kindlesparker agáinst the Chicago, Kalamazoo & Saginaw Railway Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.
Kindlesparker recovered a verdict and judgment under the federal Employers’ Eiability Act for personal injuries sustained while in the employ of the railroad company; it will be convenient to refer to Kindlesparker as plaintiff, and the railroad company as defendant. The sole issue presented here is whether plaintiff was engaged in interstate commerce at the time he received his injuries. The southern terminus of defendant’s railroad was at Kalamazoo and the northern terminus at Woodbury, within the state of Michigan, and the business consisted of general passenger…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. KastCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Jolly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Fluitt v. New Orleans, T. & M. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
- Hamilton v. Louisiana Ry. & Nav. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.