Burnham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from tbe district court for Lancaster county: Albert J. Cornish, Judge.
1DissentReese, C. J.
I cannot agree to the holding in this case. It is provided in section 1, art. I, ch. 72, Comp. St. 1907, that railroad corporations shall erect and maintain fences on the sides of their railroads, “suitable and amply sufficient to prevent cattle, horses, sheep, and hogs from getting on the said railroad, except at the crossings of public roads and highways, and within the limits of towns, cities, and villages, * * * and when such fences, * * * or any part thereof, are not in sufficiently good repair to *191accomplish the object for which the same is’herein prescribed, is intended, such railroad…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. SevcekNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. HoganNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HoganNebraska Supreme Court · 1889