Legal Opinion

Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided April 7, 1951No. Civ. No. 1373Published

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this suit under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41 (20) [now § 1346] on behalf of itself and connecting common carriers by rail, to recover the balance claimed to be due for transportation of twenty-eight carloads of freight which moved to points on its line during October, 1944, and June and July, 1945, from points of origin on lines of plaintiff and connecting carriers.

The complaint discloses that the shipments on which the plaintiff’s claim is based were transported to named points of destination pursuant to stated terms and shipping instructions…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Pacific Electric Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API