Legal Opinion

38-14 Realty Corp. v. New York City Department of Consumer Affairs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 16, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a proceeding to vacate, cancel and set aside a subpoena duces tecum served by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs upon Exxon Corporation, the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rader, J.), dated February 28, 1983, as granted the application. H Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and application dismissed. 11 Petitioner did not have standing to challenge the subpoena served upon Exxon Corporation. Even assuming that petitioner was a party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. In re SelesnickNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State of New York Commission on Governmental Operations v. Manhattan Water Works, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Beach v. Oil Transfer Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kephart v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re Out-of-State Subpoenas Issued by the New York Counsel for State of California Franchise Tax BoardNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Echel Gasoline Corp. v. New York City Department of Consumer AffairsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  4. Hyatt v. California Franchise Tax BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. Hyatt v. California Franchise Tax BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API