Neasham v. Day
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Only one assignment of error is contained in the record on appeal:
“The Court erred in denying the defendants’ Motions for a Directed Verdict at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence and renewed at the closing of all the evidence.
Defendants’ Exceptions No. 1 and 2”
In an action tried without a jury the appropriate motion by which defendants test the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ evidence is by motion for dismissal. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(b). However, this Court may elect to consider defendants’ motions for directed verdict as mo tions to dismiss in order to pass on the merits of this appeal.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Whitaker v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Pegram-West, Inc. v. Hiatt Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Fetherbay v. Sharpe Motor LinesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- Koehring Co. v. Seacrest Marine Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. PimentalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. DicksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Renovest Co. v. Hodges Development Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Ayden Tractors, Inc. v. GaskinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.