Legal Opinion
Novo v. Scott
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 26, 1983No. 83-1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
438 So.2d 477 (1983)
Roger NOVO, Petitioner,
v.
The Honorable Thomas E. SCOTT, Judge, Circuit Court, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Respondent.
No. 83-1948.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
September 26, 1983.
Black & Furci and Frank Furci, Miami, for petitioner.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Carolyn Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., Janet Reno, State Atty., and Ira N. Loewy, Asst. State Atty., for respondent.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
The petitioner was subpoenaed to testify in a criminal investigation and invoked his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination. In…
3Cases cited15 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KellySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Department of Legal Affairs v. RogersSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Tsavaris v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MontgomeryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- State v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Zile v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Costello v. FennellyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV. v. ShattoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.