Legal Opinion

Bostic v. . Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This, was a MOTION to dissolve a temporary restraining order issued in a cause pending in OleveláND .Superior Court and heard before Graham, J., at Chambers, in Charlotte, N. C., on the 8th day of March, 1895. The motion •was allowed and plaintiff appealed. The facts appear in the opinion of Associate Justice Montgomery.

1Opinion of the Court

MoNtgombey, J.:

It appears from the complaint that B. D. Suttle conveyed to W. C. Bostic the tract of land by deed dated December 10, 1890, but that the deed was not registered until the 12th of February, 1895 ; that the vendee paid $8,000 for the land, $3,000 in cash of his own means, borrowed of the plaintiff Crawford $5,000, with which the balance of the purchase money was paid, and executed together with his wife a deed of trust on the land to J. B. Bostic to secure the.payment of the $5,000 borrowed from Crawford; and that the deed of trust was registered in Cleveland county, where the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. WilloughbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Bristol v. HallyburtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Murray v. . HazellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Southerland v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. B. R. Browning & Son v. LavenderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eaton v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. M. & J. Finance Corp. v. HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Blalock v. . StrainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Colonial Trust Co. v. Sterchie Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Maxton Realty Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API