Legal Opinion

King v. UNITED SA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided October 8, 2010No. 2:09-mj-00937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES TO CLASS COUNSEL

NANCY STEIN NOWAK, United States Magistrate Judge.

On October 4, 2010, the Court considered the Application for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses to Class Counsel, which was included as part of the Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, Approval of Cy Pres Distribution, Approval of Incentive Awards to Plaintiffs, and Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses to Class Counsel (hereinafter “the Application”). Docket entry # 28. After considering the Application, the detailed exhibits submitted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders, and Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Specthrie & Lerach Molloy, Jones & Donahue, P.C. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Lawrence Laub v. Continental Assurance Company v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Continental Assurance Company v. Berger & Montague, P.A. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Martin O. Washington v. Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, Martin WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Heartland Payment Systems, Inc. Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  2. Jenkins v. Trustmark National BankDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2014
  3. C.C. v. Baylor Scott & White HealthDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API