Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Geywits v. Charlotte Valley Central School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 16, 2012Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Stein, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

While I agree with the majority that the action filed by plaintiff Hunter Geywits and his mother should be dismissed based upon a lack of evidence that he was sexually assaulted, I would permit the negligent supervision claims of the remaining infant plaintiffs against defendant Charlotte Valley Central School District (hereinafter defendant) to go forward. In my view, the majority’s decision to dismiss the complaint as to all of the plaintiffs is based on a misapprehension of the current state of the law regarding school liability for the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mirand v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Convey v. City of Rye School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Lawes v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Bell v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Brandy B. v. Eden Central School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API