Legal Opinion

People v. Pastewski

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1995No. 76447, 76518PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

The question common to these consolidated appeals involves the construction of the statute governing the determination of the maximum commitment period for a defendant who has been found not guilty of a criminal offense by reason of insanity. In each of the cases before us, the trial judge relied on a provision of the extended-term sentencing statute in calculating the defendant’s maximum period of commitment. The appellate court reversed in both cases, interpreting this court’s recent decision in People v. Palmer (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 70, as forbidding application of the extended-term statute…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. RinkIllinois Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. NielsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. NitzIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. WaidIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. KaczmarekIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. People v. JurisecIllinois Supreme Court · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API