Legal Opinion

Sibcy v. Amerine

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 9, 1967No. 21815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*41Opinion by

Mr. Justice Day.

This writ of error involves no questions of law. The claim involves a dispute between the parties over the purchase, use and agreed price of certain restaurant fixtures for which plaintiff in error refused to pay.

The trial court found on conflicting evidence that plaintiff in error agreed to buy the items listed in the complaint for a total purchase price of $1816.32. Plaintiff in error had retained the goods and to the date of the trial had control over them and had continuously used them in his business.

The disposition of plaintiff in error’s contention turns on…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kearney Inv. Corp. v. CAPITOL FS & L. ASS'N OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. Kearney Investment Corp. v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Kearney Investment Corp. v. Capitol Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API