Tolliver v. Loftin
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
Twice during the trial of the suit for personal injuries— at the close of appellant’s testimony and at the end of all the testimony — the defenants" moved for an instructed verdict. The judge denied both motions. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, and judgment was entered accordingly. The defendants then filed a motion for a new trial, and the judge, after considering it, but without making any ruling upon it, entered a contrary judgment — for the defendants. His action was in effect, and resembled somewhat, a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, but cannot be upheld as such…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Hilkmeyer v. Latin American Air Cargo ExpeditersSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Ely v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
- CONCEPT, LC v. GestenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- De Mendoza v. Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Potetti ex rel. Potetti v. Ben Lil, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.