Legal Opinion
United States v. Greenberg
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 3, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PALMIERI, District Judge.
The defendants, Greenberg and Potter, are charged with conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. 201 and 202. In substance, Potter is charged with conspiring to promise, offer and give money and things of value to Greenberg to influence him as an employee of the European Exchange System with respect to the purchase of merchandise; and Greenberg is charged with conspiring to ask, receive and accept promises for payment of money and delivery of things of value from Potter with intent to influence his official conduct. It is further charged that Greenberg would conspire to cause…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Frisbie v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. Hyman Harvey Klein, Maurice Haas, and Morris O. AlprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- James W. Harlow, Charles E. Wilson and Thomas F. Addy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- May v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Chandler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Anthony F. PreviteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- People v. IncertoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- United States v. CoganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967