Legal Opinion

Boyenton v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 16, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Fauquier county.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The plaintiff in error was prosecuted and convicted under the provisions of an act of Assembly approved Feb-*843ruary 12, 1894, entitled “an act relating to the receiving of deposits by insolvent bankers, brokers or an officer of' a bank.” Acts 1893-4, p. 222.

That act is as follows:

“1. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia, That any banker, whether State or private, any broker or officer of any trust or savings institution or of any State, bank, or employee of any private banker, who shall take and receive money from a depositor with the actual knoAvledge that the said banker, broker…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Frost v. WenieSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Boyd v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1883
  3. Augusta National Bank v. Beard's Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  4. Duff v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WolsieferSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
  2. Rose v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  3. In re RovnianekNevada Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API