Legal Opinion

De St. Germain v. Watson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1950No. Civ. 14193PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Appellant Real Estate Commissioner of the State of California, suspended, for a period of 15 days, respondent’s license to engage in business as a real estate broker. In a mandamus proceeding brought in the superior court, a judgment was entered vacating that suspension. From that judgment the commissioner has appealed on the judgment roll alone.

Question Presented

The main question presented is whether the acceptance by a real estate broker of a nonnegotiable promissory note as the down payment on an agreement to purchase real property without informing the seller, who is the broker’s client,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. King v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Langford v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. California Stearns Co. v. TreadwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Reese v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Middelsteadt v. KarpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Denny v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API