De St. Germain v. Watson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Appellant Real Estate Commissioner of the State of California, suspended, for a period of 15 days, respondent’s license to engage in business as a real estate broker. In a mandamus proceeding brought in the superior court, a judgment was entered vacating that suspension. From that judgment the commissioner has appealed on the judgment roll alone.
Question Presented
The main question presented is whether the acceptance by a real estate broker of a nonnegotiable promissory note as the down payment on an agreement to purchase real property without informing the seller, who is the broker’s client,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rattray v. ScudderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- King v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Langford v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- California Stearns Co. v. TreadwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Widing v. JENSEN, REAL ESTATE COMMISSIONEROregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Reese v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- Middelsteadt v. KarpeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Denny v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.