Commonwealth v. Holland
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 41—INDICTMENT— APPEAL PROM METCALFE CIRCUIT COURT. 1. The defendant’s license was invalid. Kentucky Statutes, section: 4224. 2. The sale was unauthorized, even assuming the validity of the license. Moody v. Com., 6 Ky. Law Rep., 219; Gnadinger v. Com.,, 4 Ky. Law Rep., 514.,
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE BURNAM
delivered tiie opinion of the court.
Appellee was indicted for retailing spirituous liquors without a license. By agreement a jury was waived, and' the case heard by the court on the following agreed facts:. In September, 1896, appellee made application to the-County Court for a license, as a brandy distiller, to sell .apple brandy at his residence, in Metcalfe county, in quantities of not less than a qnart, which was granted by the court;' appellee paying therefor the sum of $25. Subsequent thereto, and within the time covered by the license, *324lie sold a quart of brandy at liis…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Illinois Cent. R. v. MoriarityTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Stafford v. FieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- State ex rel. Sheeks v. HilliardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901