Legal Opinion

Clark v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic Preservation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1201Appeal from an order and judgment (one document) of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Amy J. Fricano, J.), entered March 12, 2003. The order and judgment, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant’s motion in part, dismissed certain causes of action and denied plaintiffs cross motion to disqualify the Attorney General from representing defendant.

It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted those parts of defendant’s motion seeking dismissal of the first four causes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Solow v. W. R. Grace & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Clark v. New York State Office of Parks, Recreation & Historic PreservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Town of Tonawanda AssessorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. Vasquez v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API