Legal Opinion

People v. Casegeanda

New York Court of General Session of the Peace

Decided December 15, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment convicting the defendant of the vio-1 lation of city ordinances.

1Opinion of the Court

GOFF (Recorder).

Carlo Casegeanda, the defendant, was, by the city magistrate, adjudged guilty of a violation ^f section 33 of the corporation ordinances of 1880, in that he obstructed the sidewalk with a boot-blacking stand; and from such judgment and' conviction he appeals. Several grounds of error are assigned by the appellant, but only one of them is necessary to a consideration of the case as presented by the return. The complainant, as captain of the police, was thus examined:

“Q. Are you familiar with section 33 of the city ordinance? A. 1 have a copy here of the amended ordinance of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MagnusNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1915
  2. People v. CroninNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1915
  3. People v. TrainaNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1915
  4. People v. TrainaNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API