Legal Opinion

Erdman v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 14, 1989No. 79, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES E. ORTH, Jr., Judge, Specially Assigned.

I

(A)

In a criminal cause “[a] defendant may plead not guilty, guilty, or, with the consent of the court, nolo contendere. In addition to any of these pleas, the defendant may interpose the defense of insanity as permitted by law.” Md.Rule 4-242(a).

If a defendant intends to rely on a plea of not criminally responsible, the defendant or defense counsel shall file a written plea alleging, in substance, that when the alleged crime was committed, the defendant was not criminally responsible by reason of insanity under the test for criminal…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. Doering v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  4. Shoemaker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Mark Daryl BeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
  2. People v. AliwoliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Sidbury v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Aizupitis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
  5. Clark v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API