Holland v. New Hampshire Board of Chiropractic Examiners
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issue in this matter is whether the New Hampshire Board of Chiropractic Examiners (board) is authorized to conduct an oral clinical examination in addition to the written examination required by RSA 316:11 (Supp. 1977).
Plaintiffs are persons who have passed parts one and two of the national examination given by the National Board of Chiropractic Examiners. They brought a petition for mandamus to compel the State board to issue licenses to them without an oral clinical examination. The New Hampshire Chiropractic Association intervened, urging that we rule that the board is authorized to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New Hampshire Retail Grocers Ass'n v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Kalloch v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
- Ahern v. Laconia Country Club, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Wyatt v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1908
- N.H. Board C. v. CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Win-Tasch Corp. v. Town of MerrimackSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Piascik-Lambeth v. Textron AutomotiveDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000