Teal v. State

CATES, Judge.

The Circuit Court, on motion .of the, State, dismissed the petition for coram.no-! bis and a corollary request for a free tran- ■ script of evidence under Act 62, September • 15, 1961 (Acts 1961, p. 1930).

We consider this action proper because' the only averment that verges on coram nobis relief is that Teal bought a car from’1 E. L. Anderson of Dallas, Texas, and ;had a bill of sale for it.

There is no allegation that (a)’ justifiably accounts for the late disclosure (.or finding) of this evidence; (b) Mr.. Anderson’s testimony would ex proprio vigore have prevented the judgment…