Legal Opinion

Gale v. Fred W. Pearce Corporation

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 22, 1928No. 26,894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Motion by plaintiff to dismiss the appeal on the stated grounds that the appeal is frivolous and taken from a nonappealable order.

The court at the close of the evidence directed a verdict in favor of the defendant, and plaintiff excepted thereto. Plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds of errors of law occurring at the trial, error in directing the verdict, and that the verdict is not justified by the evidence. The court granted a new trial. The order, made January 28, 1928, did not state on what grounds the new trial was granted. On February 14, 1928, the court filed a memorandum…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mathieson v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API